In practice, inclusion means a number of things. Gaines and Jager argue that one of the most important applications of this principle is access to housing, regardless of one's income, age, or other distinguishing demographic. But access to housing isn't enough if we don't value and identify with our neighbourhood.
We value our neighbourhood more when we spend time in them: when we shop at local stores, visit the library, walk in the parks and trails, talk with our neighbours, or go for a swim at the community centre. But if we don't feel welcome and included in these shared spaces what prompts us to invest in our community?
I realize "shared spaces" has become a buzz word, which in effect lessens the potency of its meaning. However, enough of its original meaning remains, prompting the question, "how well do we truly share such spaces?"
In the articles on gentrification a common theme emerges: though each author has a unique perspective on "urban renewal", there is an underlying sense that "undesirables" are being marginalized. If inclusion is paramount to a healthy city, Hamilton may be showing signs of illness.
Perhaps you wonder if I could be exaggerating the importance of inclusion. Here it may be helpful to mention that this is not just a question of ethics. We are not just debating whether development on James Street North is "good" or "bad". In practice, inclusion simply creates better cities –besides healthier children and happier families a more inclusive and sustainable city also creates stronger businesses and more engaged citizens.
As community members feel more "at home" in their own neighbourhoods, their identity becomes more rooted in the city. Greater access to education, leisure facilities, and green spaces creates a greater sense of belonging. This means they will be more likely to shop locally, open businesses, and take out mortgages.
In his book Concrete Reveries, Mark Kingwall challenges his reader to consider both the long term gains we want to attain and the short term benefits that may be distracting us. Gentrification has a history of offering much of the latter and few of the former.
